LOOK AT THE BLOG
A brief look at the origins, evidence, and risks of frequency therapy.
FREQUENCY TREATMENT FOR CANCER:
WHAT SCIENCE SAYS
ORIGINS AND PRINCIPLES
The cellular resonance idea claims the “right” frequency can disrupt cancer cells; debated since the 1920s.
THE RIFE STORY AND CONTEXT
Rife claimed frequency targeting of cancer; methods lacked rigor and results weren’t replicated.
MODERN FREQUENCY DEVICES
Today’s devices offer ranges like 100-300 kHz; other EM/LLLT options exist but evidence is limited.
“CANCER FREQUENCIES” CLAIM
100-300 kHz is touted as “cancer-killing”; evidence is mixed and mostly anecdotal, more research needed.
LOOK AT THE BLOG
LAB VS CLINICAL
In vitro effects reported; robust human clinical evidence is lacking, efficacy uncertain.
AGENCIES AND REGULATION
The FDA has issued warnings/enforcement. NCI and ACS cite no convincing clinical evidence and advise caution.
RISKS AND DECISIONS
Potential
physical risks,
financial/emotional burden, and most critically, delays in standard care.
Stories
More
HOW LONG DOES A PAIN BLOCK LAST AFTER SURGERY? WHAT TO EXPECT
NERVE BLOCK IN NECK: 7 KEY FACTS & BENEFITS
See More
See More