Breast Prosthesis Removal Common Procedures explained as surgical techniques used to remove implants safely and restore breast balance

Plastic surgery restores form and function through reconstructive procedures, cosmetic enhancements, and body contouring.

We're Here to Help.
Get in Touch.

Send us all your questions or requests, and our expert team will assist you.

Doctors

En Bloc Capsulectomy

En Bloc Capsulectomy is widely considered the gold standard for breast implant removal, particularly for patients concerned with Breast Implant Illness (BII) or silicone rupture. The term translates to “as a whole” or “in one block.” Ideally, the surgeon dissects the scar tissue capsule away from the patient’s breast tissue while keeping the capsule completely intact with the implant inside.

This technique is designed to act as a containment system. If the implant is ruptured or if there are bacterial biofilms on the surface, removing the capsule intact prevents these materials from spilling into the surgical pocket. It ensures that any inflammatory triggers contained within the scar tissue are physically removed from the body.

  • Total containment of the implant and contents
  • Prevention of silicone leakage into the pocket
  • Removal of inflammatory biofilm burden
  • Optimal technique for ruptured silicone
  • Preferred method for BII symptom relief

Performing a true En Bloc resection requires precision and a larger incision than the original placement. The surgeon must carefully separate the capsule from the ribs, lung lining (pleura), and pectoral muscle. In some cases, if the capsule is dangerously adhered to vital structures such as the lungs or large blood vessels, a true En Bloc may be unsafe.

In such scenarios, a “Total Capsulectomy” is performed, in which the entire capsule is removed, though perhaps in pieces to ensure safety. The intent remains the same: the complete removal of the foreign material and the reactive tissue envelope.

  • Requirement for extended surgical access
  • Meticulous dissection of vital structures
  • Safety modifications near the pleura and ribs
  • Conversion to total capsulectomy if necessary
  • Prioritization of patient safety over technique dogma
Icon LIV Hospital

Total Capsulectomy

PLASTIC SURGERY

A Total Capsulectomy involves the removal of the entire scar tissue capsule and the implant. Unlike the En Bloc technique, the capsule does not necessarily come out in one single piece containing the implant. The implant might be removed first, followed by the dissection and removal of the capsule.

This procedure is often utilized when an En Bloc removal is not technically feasible due to thin tissues or adherence to the chest wall. It is also common when the implant is placed under the muscle, where the posterior capsule (the part against the ribs) is fragile and stuck to the rib cage.

  • Complete removal of all capsule tissue
  • Sequential removal of the implant, then the capsule
  • Application in submuscular placement cases
  • Management of rib cage adherence
  • Effective reduction of scar tissue burden

The goal of a Total Capsulectomy is to leave no scar tissue behind. This is crucial for patients who believe the capsule itself is a source of inflammation or pain. It allows the breast pocket to heal fully, with the native tissues adhering back together without a barrier of scar tissue.

Surgeons will often use this method for saline implants, where containment of the contents is less critical, or for intact silicone implants. It provides a thorough cleaning of the breast pocket.

  • Elimination of residual inflammatory tissue
  • Promotion of pocket closure and healing
  • Suitability for intact saline devices
  • Thorough debridement of the surgical site
  • Restoration of natural tissue planes
Icon 1 LIV Hospital

Partial Capsulectomy

shutterstock 2438647769 LIV Hospital

A Partial Capsulectomy involves removing only a portion of the scar tissue capsule. This is typically done when the capsule is fragile (like cellophane) and poses no health risk, or when removing the posterior portion of the capsule would cause significant bleeding or damage to the chest wall (pneumothorax).

In this procedure, the anterior capsule (the part under the skin or breast tissue) is usually removed because it is accessible and palpable. The posterior capsule may be left behind to reabsorb naturally or cauterized to disrupt its continuity.

  • Removal of the accessible anterior capsule
  • Preservation of dangerous posterior adherence
  • Prevention of pneumothorax and hemorrhage
  • Utilization for thin, non-pathological capsules
  • Natural reabsorption of residual tissue

This approach is controversial in the BII community but is clinically sound for patients without systemic symptoms or rupture. It reduces the trauma of surgery and shortens recovery time. It is a risk-benefit calculation made by the surgeon based on the intraoperative findings.

The remaining capsule does not typically cause long-term issues in asymptomatic patients. However, for those with calcification or contracture, a partial removal is usually insufficient to solve the physical problem.

  • Reduction of surgical trauma and risk
  • Clinical judgment based on anatomy
  • Suitability for asymptomatic patients
  • Lower risk of postoperative hematoma
  • Insufficiency for contracture or calcification

Implant Removal with Capsule Preservation

In some cases, primarily with saline implants and no history of contracture or illness, the surgeon may remove only the implant and leave the capsule entirely in place. This is the least invasive option. The body eventually resorbs or compresses the empty capsule scar tissue.

This procedure can often be done through tiny incisions and has the quickest recovery. It is generally reserved for patients who are not concerned about systemic illness and want the volume removed.

  • The least invasive surgical option
  • Retention of the native scar envelope
  • Rapid recovery and minimal dissection
  • Natural remodeling of the empty pocket
  • Reservation for uncomplicated saline cases

However, leaving the capsule creates a potential space where fluid (seroma) can accumulate. It also leaves behind the tissue that has been in contact with the implant. For patients seeking a “clean slate,” this is rarely the preferred method.

The decision to leave the capsule must be made with the understanding that the scar tissue will remain inside the breast. It avoids the risks associated with dissecting tissue off the ribs but does not remove the biological footprint of the implant.

  • Potential for seroma formation in the void
  • Retention of implant contacting tissue
  • Avoidance of chest wall dissection risks
  • Acceptance of residual scar burden
  • Exclusion for patients seeking detox
PLASTIC SURGERY

Explant with Mastopexy (Breast Lift)

Removing an implant leaves behind a stretched skin envelope that has lost its volume. For many women, this results in significant ptosis (sagging) and a deflated appearance. Combining explantation with a mastopexy, or breast lift, is a standard procedure to restore an aesthetically pleasing shape.

The mastopexy involves removing excess skin and reshaping the remaining breast tissue to sit higher on the chest wall. The nipple-areola complex is moved to a more youthful position. This procedure does not add volume but tightens the skin “brassiere” to fit the more miniature breast mound.

  • Removal of redundant skin envelope
  • Reshaping of native breast parenchyma
  • Elevation of the nipple-areola complex
  • Restoration of a youthful breast position
  • Correction of deflation and ptosis

This combined procedure is more complex and leaves more scarring than a simple explant. The incisions typically follow an anchor (inverted-T) or lollipop (vertical) pattern. However, the aesthetic outcome is vastly superior for women with moderate to severe sagging.

It transforms the chest from a “deflated” look to a “perky” look, albeit smaller. This is often crucial for the psychological adjustment to life without implants, providing a positive aesthetic result rather than just a loss of volume.

  • Utilization of anchor or vertical incisions
  • Superior aesthetic contouring
  • Mitigation of the “deflated” post-explant look
  • Psychological benefit of aesthetic restoration
  • Complex surgical planning and execution

Explant with Fat Grafting (Auto-Augmentation)

  • For patients who want to remove their implants but fear being too flat, fat grafting offers a natural alternative for volume. This procedure involves performing liposuction on other parts of the body (abdomen, flanks, thighs) and injecting the purified fat into the breasts.

    Fat grafting allows subtle restoration of volume and refinement of cleavage and upper pole fullness. It does not replace the volume of a large implant but can create a B or small C cup, depending on the patient’s anatomy and fat availability.

    • Harvesting of autologous fat via liposuction
    • Purification and injection into breast tissue
    • Restoration of modest volume and fullness
    • Refinement of cleavage and contour
    • Natural alternative to prosthetic volume

    This procedure can be done simultaneously with explant or as a staged procedure months later. Doing it simultaneously carries a risk of fat necrosis if the breast tissue is traumatized by the capsulectomy. Staged procedures often yield better retention.

    Fat grafting also improves the quality of the skin and tissue due to the stem cells present in the fat. It helps to soften the breast and smooth out irregularities left by the implant removal.

    • Option for a simultaneous or staged approach
    • Consideration of graft survival rates
    • Stem cell improvement of tissue quality
    • Softening of post-surgical irregularities
    • Customization of volume distribution

Staged Reconstruction

In cases where the skin is extremely stretched or the blood supply is compromised, surgeons may recommend a staged approach. Stage one involves removing the implants and capsules. The breast is allowed to heal and retract naturally for several months.

Stage two involves the aesthetic reconstruction, such as a lift or fat grafting. This delay allows the tissues to recover their blood supply and elasticity, making the second surgery safer and more predictable. It minimizes the risk of nipple necrosis or wound-healing complications.

  • Separation of removal and reconstruction
  • Period of natural tissue retraction
  • Optimization of vascular recovery
  • Reduction of wound complication risks
  • Enhanced predictability of aesthetic outcome

This approach requires patience but is often the safest path for high-risk patients (e.g., smokers, diabetics, or those with massive implants). It allows the surgeon to see exactly what the baseline breast tissue looks like before reshaping it.

    • Necessity for patient patience
    • Safety prioritization for high-risk groups
    • Accurate assessment of baseline tissue
    • Customization of the secondary procedure
    • Minimization of tissue trauma

30 Years of
Excellence

Trusted Worldwide

With patients from across the globe, we bring over three decades of medical

Book a Free Certified Online
Doctor Consultation

Clinics/branches
Prof. MD. Yaşar Çokkeser Prof. MD. Yaşar Çokkeser Plastic Surgery
Group 346 LIV Hospital

Reviews from 9,651

4,9

Was this article helpful?

Was this article helpful?

We're Here to Help.
Get in Touch.

Send us all your questions or requests, and our expert team will assist you.

Doctors

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What determines if I need a lift?

If your nipple sits below the breast crease (inframammary fold), you have significant ptosis. Reducing the implant volume will likely make the sagging more pronounced. A lift is required to move the nipple up and tighten the skin for a perky shape.

Yes, many surgeons perform them together. However, some prefer to wait 3-6 months to let the breast pocket heal and contract. Doing it later often provides a better “canvas” for the fat and ensures higher fat survival rates.

No. If the capsule is extremely thin or stuck tightly to the ribs or lungs, attempting an En Bloc removal can cause dangerous bleeding or a punctured lung. A safe surgeon will switch to a Total Capsulectomy to protect your life while still removing the tissue.

Yes. A simple explanation often uses the old scar. A lift requires new incisions to remove excess skin, typically around the areola, vertically down the breast, and sometimes along the crease (anchor pattern). These scars fade but are permanent.

Some surgeons use internal suturing techniques (progressive tension sutures) to close the pocket and avoid the need for drains. However, most explant surgeries use drains to prevent fluid buildup (seroma) in the ample space left by the implant.

Spine Hospital of Louisiana

Let's Talk About Your Health

BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE...

Leave your phone number and our medical team will call you back to discuss your healthcare needs and answer all your questions.

Let's Talk About Your Health

How helpful was it?

helpful
helpful
helpful
Your Comparison List (you must select at least 2 packages)