Last Updated on November 3, 2025 by mcelik
The advent of robotics technology in hernia repair has introduced a new dimension in surgical procedures. By enhancing precision and visualization, robotic hernia repair allows surgeons to potentially achieve better outcomes.
For patients considering hernia repair, the question of whether robotic hernia surgery is better than traditional methods is crucial. The integration of advanced robotics in surgery offers a promising alternative, with potential benefits including reduced recovery time and minimized complications.
A hernia occurs when an organ or tissue bulges through a weakened area in the muscle or connective tissue that normally holds it in place. This condition can lead to discomfort, pain, and potentially serious complications if left untreated.
Hernias are not limited to one specific area or cause; they can manifest in various forms and locations, each with its own set of underlying reasons and symptoms.
There are several types of hernias, including inguinal, umbilical, incisional, and hiatal hernias, among others. Inguinal hernias, the most common type, occur when tissue, such as part of the intestine, protrudes through a weak spot in the abdominal muscles in the groin area.
Umbilical hernias occur near the belly button, typically due to a weakness in the abdominal wall. Incisional hernias develop at the site of a previous surgical incision, often resulting from inadequate healing or excessive strain on the scar tissue.
| Type of Hernia | Common Cause | Typical Symptoms |
| Inguinal Hernia | Weakness in abdominal muscles | Pain or discomfort in the groin, especially when coughing or lifting |
| Umbilical Hernia | Weakness near the belly button | A bulge or swelling near the navel, often accompanied by discomfort |
| Incisional Hernia | Inadequate healing of a surgical scar | A bulge at the site of a previous surgical incision, potentially with pain or discomfort |
Not all hernias require immediate surgical intervention. However, surgery becomes necessary when a hernia causes significant pain, becomes incarcerated (trapped), or strangulated (cut off from blood supply).
Surgical repair, or hernia repair, is a common procedure aimed at reinforcing the weakened area through which the hernia occurred. The decision to undergo surgery depends on various factors, including the type of hernia, its size, and the patient’s overall health.
Hernia repair techniques have evolved considerably, from traditional open surgeries to more sophisticated laparoscopic and robotic procedures. This evolution reflects the ongoing quest for improved patient outcomes and reduced recovery times.
Historically, hernia repair was performed through open surgery, involving significant incisions and subsequent recovery periods. The earliest recorded attempts at hernia repair date back to the late 19th century, with techniques continually being refined over the years.
“The development of hernia repair techniques has been a gradual process, with significant milestones marking the transition from open to minimally invasive procedures.”
E. M. H. M. van der Heijden et al., Journal of Surgical Research
The introduction of mesh repairs in the mid-20th century represented a significant advancement, reducing recurrence rates and improving patient outcomes. However, open surgery still involved considerable tissue disruption and lengthy recovery times.
Modern surgical innovations have transformed hernia repair, with laparoscopic and robotic techniques now widely adopted. Laparoscopic hernia repair, introduced in the late 20th century, offered a minimally invasive alternative, reducing tissue trauma and accelerating recovery.
The advent of robotic hernia surgery in 2007 marked a new era in hernia repair. Robotic systems, such as the Da Vinci Surgical System, provide enhanced visualization, precision, and dexterity, allowing for complex repairs to be performed with greater ease.
| Technique | Key Features | Benefits |
| Open Hernia Repair | Large incision, mesh placement | Effective, but lengthy recovery |
| Laparoscopic Hernia Repair | Minimally invasive, smaller incisions | Reduced recovery time, less tissue trauma |
| Robotic Hernia Surgery | Enhanced visualization, precise instrument control | Improved outcomes, complex repairs feasible |
The table above illustrates the progression of hernia repair techniques, highlighting the advancements and benefits associated with modern surgical innovations.
Traditional open hernia surgery has been a cornerstone in hernia repair for decades, offering a straightforward approach to addressing hernias. This method involves making an incision in the abdomen to access the hernia directly.
The open hernia repair technique begins with the patient under appropriate anesthesia. The surgeon then makes an incision near the hernia site, gently dissects the tissue to expose the hernia sac, and either pushes it back into place or removes it. The weakened area is then reinforced, often with a synthetic mesh to provide additional support and reduce the risk of recurrence.
Mesh placement is a critical step in open hernia surgery, as it significantly reduces the likelihood of hernia recurrence. The mesh is carefully positioned to cover the weakened area, and it is secured with sutures or staples.
The use of mesh in open hernia repair has become a standard practice due to its effectiveness in reducing recurrence rates. The mesh acts as a reinforcement, supporting the weakened tissue and allowing it to heal.
The placement of mesh can be done in various ways, including:
Open hernia surgery has several advantages, including its simplicity and the ability to perform it without specialized equipment. However, it also has limitations, such as a potentially longer recovery time and a larger scar compared to minimally invasive techniques.
| Aspect | Advantages | Limitations |
| Recovery Time | Effective for complex cases | Generally longer than laparoscopic or robotic surgery |
| Scarring | Single incision allows for direct access | Results in a larger scar |
| Equipment Requirement | Can be performed without specialized equipment | Limited by the surgeon’s direct visualization |
In conclusion, traditional open hernia surgery remains a viable option for hernia repair, offering a straightforward and effective method. Understanding its techniques, advantages, and limitations is crucial for both surgeons and patients when considering the best approach for hernia treatment.
Laparoscopic hernia repair has revolutionized the field of surgical interventions for hernias, offering a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open surgery. This approach involves inflating the abdomen with carbon dioxide to provide a clear visual field, and using a laparoscope—a thin, lighted tube with a camera—to visualize the hernia on a monitor.
The mechanics of laparoscopic hernia repair involve several key steps. First, the abdomen is insufflated with carbon dioxide to create space for visualization. Then, trocars are inserted through small incisions to allow for the passage of surgical instruments. The surgeon uses these instruments to dissect the hernia sac and repair the defect, often with the placement of a synthetic mesh to reinforce the weakened area.
The use of laparoscopy allows for a detailed examination of the hernia and surrounding tissue, enabling precise repair with minimal disruption to the patient’s anatomy.
There are primarily two types of laparoscopic hernia repairs: Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) repair.
| Procedure | Description | Benefits |
| TAPP | Entails entering the abdominal cavity to place mesh. | Allows for direct visualization of the hernia and surrounding anatomy. |
| TEP | Performed outside the peritoneal cavity. | Reduces the risk of intra-abdominal complications. |
Laparoscopic hernia repair offers several benefits, including reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery times, and less visible scarring compared to open hernia repair. However, it also has its drawbacks, such as the need for specialized training for surgeons and the potential for certain complications related to the laparoscopic technique.
The choice between laparoscopic and other forms of hernia repair depends on various factors, including the type and size of the hernia, patient health, and surgeon expertise.
The introduction of robotic technology has revolutionized hernia surgery, offering enhanced precision. Robotic hernia surgery utilizes the Da Vinci Surgical System, a sophisticated technology that enables surgeons to perform complex procedures with improved accuracy and control.
The Da Vinci Surgical System is a state-of-the-art robotic platform designed to facilitate complex surgical procedures. It includes a high-definition 3D vision system, which provides surgeons with a clear and magnified view of the surgical site. The system’s technology allows for precise dissection and suturing, reducing the risk of complications.
The surgical console is the control center of the Da Vinci system, where the surgeon sits and operates the robotic instruments. The console provides ergonomic comfort and precise control over the instruments, allowing for intricate movements. The robotic instruments are designed to mimic the human wrist, offering a range of motion that is not possible with traditional laparoscopic instruments.
| Feature | Description | Benefit |
| 3D Vision System | High-definition 3D visualization | Enhanced clarity and precision |
| Robotic Instruments | Highly articulated instruments | Improved dexterity and control |
| Surgical Console | Ergonomic design for surgeon comfort | Reduced fatigue and improved focus |
The combination of the Da Vinci Surgical System’s technology, the surgical console, and the robotic instruments makes robotic hernia surgery a highly effective and precise procedure. As we continue to explore the benefits and outcomes of robotic hernia surgery, it becomes clear that this technology is significantly advancing the field of hernia repair.
With the increasing prevalence of robotic hernia surgery, it’s crucial to examine the evidence supporting its efficacy. The medical community relies on rigorous clinical studies and meta-analyses to understand the true benefits and limitations of this advanced surgical technique.
Numerous clinical studies have compared the outcomes of robotic hernia surgery with those of traditional laparoscopic and open surgery. A key finding from recent research is that robotic hernia surgery often results in similar safety parameters and postoperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery. For instance, a study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons found that robotic hernia repair was associated with reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays in some cases.
Another critical aspect is the precision and dexterity offered by robotic systems, which can lead to more effective hernia repairs. Research has shown that the use of robotic technology can result in fewer complications and recurrences, although more data is needed to confirm these findings.
Meta-analyses provide a comprehensive overview by pooling data from multiple studies, offering insights into the broader implications of robotic hernia surgery. A meta-analysis published in the journal Hernia found that robotic hernia repair was associated with lower rates of postoperative complications compared to open repair, though the evidence was less clear when comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches.
These analyses underscore the need for continued research to fully understand the benefits and potential drawbacks of robotic hernia surgery. As the field evolves, the integration of new evidence will be crucial in shaping clinical practice guidelines and informing patient decisions.
Robotic and laparoscopic hernia surgeries, while both minimally invasive, have distinct differences in technology and application. The choice between these two methods depends on various factors, including the complexity of the hernia, the surgeon’s expertise, and the patient’s overall health.
The primary difference between robotic and laparoscopic hernia surgery lies in the technology used. Laparoscopic surgery involves the use of a laparoscope, a thin tube with a camera, and instruments that are manipulated directly by the surgeon. In contrast, robotic surgery utilizes a robotic system, such as the Da Vinci Surgical System, which allows for enhanced dexterity and visualization through a console controlled by the surgeon.
Robotic surgery offers improved instrument articulation and 3D visualization, which can be particularly beneficial in complex hernia cases. According to a study published in the Journal of Surgical Endoscopy, robotic hernia repair was associated with reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays compared to traditional laparoscopic methods.
“The robotic approach provides a high-definition, 3D view of the surgical site, allowing for more precise dissection and mesh placement.”
Studies comparing the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic hernia surgery have shown that both methods have similar success rates in terms of hernia recurrence. However, robotic surgery may offer advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain and complications, particularly in complex cases.
A meta-analysis published in the journal Hernia found that while both methods are effective, robotic hernia repair was associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications.
The learning curve for robotic hernia surgery is generally considered steeper than for laparoscopic surgery, primarily due to the need for surgeons to become familiar with the robotic system’s operation and to develop the necessary skills for console-based surgery.
| Aspect | Robotic Surgery | Laparoscopic Surgery |
| Learning Curve | Steeper due to console-based controls | More familiar for surgeons with laparoscopic experience |
| Visualization | 3D visualization with enhanced clarity | 2D visualization through laparoscope |
In conclusion, while both robotic and laparoscopic hernia surgeries have their place in modern surgical practice, the choice between them should be based on individual patient needs, the complexity of the hernia, and the surgeon’s expertise.
With its cutting-edge technology, robotic hernia surgery offers several advantages over traditional surgical methods. The robotic platform is designed to enhance the surgeon’s capabilities, providing a more precise and effective treatment option for patients.
One of the key benefits of robotic hernia surgery is its enhanced 3D visualization. The robotic system provides a high-definition, 3D view of the surgical site, allowing surgeons to navigate complex anatomy with greater ease and accuracy. This improved visualization enables surgeons to identify and preserve critical structures, reducing the risk of complications.
Robotic hernia surgery also offers improved instrument dexterity, allowing for more precise dissection and suturing. The robotic instruments are designed to mimic the natural movements of the human hand, providing a greater range of motion and flexibility. This enhanced dexterity enables surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater ease and accuracy.
The advantages of robotic hernia surgery are particularly evident in complex hernia cases. The enhanced visualization and instrument dexterity provided by the robotic platform enable surgeons to tackle challenging cases with greater confidence and precision. This can lead to improved outcomes for patients with complex hernias, who may have otherwise faced a more complicated and risky surgical procedure.
In summary, robotic hernia surgery offers several significant advantages, including enhanced 3D visualization, improved instrument dexterity, and benefits for complex hernia cases. These benefits make robotic hernia surgery an attractive option for both surgeons and patients seeking effective and minimally invasive treatment.
Understanding the recovery timeline is crucial for patients undergoing robotic hernia surgery. This advanced surgical technique has been shown to offer a faster recovery compared to traditional open surgery, with benefits including less pain and smaller scars. As patients consider this option, it’s essential to delve into the specifics of what to expect during the recovery period.
The recovery timeline for robotic hernia surgery is generally shorter than that of traditional open surgery. Most patients can expect to return to their normal activities within a few weeks. According to recent studies, the average recovery time is significantly reduced, allowing patients to resume their daily routines sooner.
Key milestones in the recovery timeline include:
One of the significant advantages of robotic hernia surgery is the ability to return to normal activities relatively quickly. Patients are usually advised to avoid heavy lifting and strenuous activities for a few weeks post-surgery. However, they can gradually resume their daily routines, including driving and returning to work, within a short period.
“Robotic surgery allows for a more rapid recovery, enabling patients to return to their normal lives sooner,” says a renowned surgeon specializing in robotic hernia repairs.
When comparing robotic hernia surgery recovery to traditional open surgery, several differences become apparent. Robotic surgery typically results in less postoperative pain, smaller scars, and a reduced risk of complications. The recovery process is also generally smoother, with patients experiencing less discomfort during the healing process.
A study comparing the two methods found that patients who underwent robotic hernia surgery had a significantly shorter recovery time and fewer complications compared to those who had traditional open surgery.
| Recovery Aspect | Robotic Hernia Surgery | Traditional Open Surgery |
| Recovery Time | Shorter (few weeks) | Longer (several weeks to months) |
| Postoperative Pain | Less pain | More pain |
| Scarring | Smaller scars | Larger scars |
Effective pain management is crucial for a smooth recovery after robotic hernia surgery. Patients generally experience less pain after robotic hernia surgery compared to traditional open surgery. This is due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure, which results in smaller incisions and less tissue trauma.
The level of pain experienced after robotic hernia surgery can vary from patient to patient. However, most patients report mild to moderate pain, which is typically manageable with over-the-counter pain medications. The duration of pain is usually short-lived, with significant improvement within the first few days post-surgery.
“The pain after robotic hernia surgery is generally less than what I expected,” says a renowned surgeon. “Patients are often able to return to their normal activities within a week or two, with minimal discomfort.”
Pain control is a critical aspect of post-operative care. Surgeons often employ a multimodal approach to pain management, which may include a combination of medications such as acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and in some cases, narcotics for more severe pain. Additionally, patients are advised on post-operative care instructions to minimize discomfort and promote healing.
By understanding the expected pain levels and utilizing effective pain control strategies, patients can have a more comfortable and speedy recovery after robotic hernia surgery.
One of the key benefits of robotic hernia surgery is its ability to minimize scarring and improve aesthetic results. This aspect is particularly important for patients who are concerned about the visual impact of their surgery.
Robotic hernia surgery involves making smaller incisions compared to traditional open surgery. The Da Vinci Surgical System allows for precise movements and control, enabling surgeons to place incisions in less conspicuous locations. This results in less noticeable scarring and improved cosmetic outcomes.
The long-term aesthetic results of robotic hernia surgery are generally favorable. Patients typically experience minimal scarring that fades over time. The enhanced visualization and precision offered by the robotic system contribute to these positive outcomes.
| Aspect | Robotic Hernia Surgery | Traditional Open Surgery |
| Incision Size | Smaller (typically 1-2 cm) | Larger (often 5-10 cm or more) |
| Scarring | Minimal, less noticeable | More pronounced, potentially larger |
| Long-term Aesthetic Outcome | Favorable, with minimal long-term impact | Variable, potentially more significant long-term impact |
The cosmetic benefits of robotic hernia surgery make it an attractive option for patients concerned about scarring and aesthetic outcomes. By leveraging the precision and control of robotic systems, surgeons can achieve excellent results that meet both the functional and cosmetic needs of their patients.
As with any surgical procedure, robotic hernia surgery carries certain risks and complications that need to be considered. Understanding these potential issues is crucial for patients to make informed decisions about their care.
Intraoperative complications during robotic hernia surgery can include bleeding, injury to surrounding organs, and difficulties related to the robotic system. Although rare, these complications can have significant implications for the patient’s recovery and overall outcome.
The precision of the robotic system can minimize some risks, but it is not entirely immune to complications. For instance, technical issues with the robotic equipment can occur, although they are extremely rare with modern systems like the Da Vinci Surgical System.
Postoperative risks following robotic hernia surgery include infection, hernia recurrence, and adhesions. While the minimally invasive nature of robotic surgery can reduce some of these risks compared to open surgery, they are still potential complications that patients should be aware of.
Effective postoperative care and follow-up are crucial in managing these risks and ensuring a smooth recovery. Patients are typically advised on postoperative care strategies to minimize the risk of complications.
When comparing the risks of robotic hernia surgery to other surgical methods, such as laparoscopic or open surgery, several factors come into play. Robotic surgery offers enhanced visualization and precision, which can potentially reduce the risk of certain complications.
However, the risk profile can vary depending on the patient’s overall health, the complexity of the hernia, and the surgeon’s experience with the robotic system. Studies comparing outcomes across different surgical techniques provide valuable insights into their relative risks and benefits.
Ensuring patient safety during robotic hernia surgery involves a combination of cutting-edge technology and rigorous training for surgeons. The safety profile of this surgical approach is multifaceted, encompassing both the inherent safeguards within the robotic system and the expertise of the surgeons operating it.
The robotic system used in hernia surgery, such as the Da Vinci Surgical System, is equipped with multiple safety features. These include redundant systems that ensure continued safe operation in case of component failure, and advanced visualization that provides surgeons with a clear and detailed view of the surgical site.
The technology also includes mechanisms to prevent accidental tissue damage, such as instrument tip articulation and motion scaling, which allow for precise movements. These features collectively contribute to minimizing the risk of complications during surgery.
Surgeon training is a critical component of the safety profile of robotic hernia surgery. Surgeons must undergo comprehensive training programs that include both theoretical and practical components. These programs are designed to ensure that surgeons are proficient in operating the robotic system and in performing the specific surgical procedures.
Certification requirements vary by institution but typically involve completing a certain number of cases under supervision and demonstrating competence in robotic surgery techniques. This rigorous training and certification process helps to ensure that surgeons are equipped to handle the complexities of robotic hernia surgery, further enhancing patient safety.
The combination of advanced technology and highly trained surgeons is key to the strong safety profile of robotic hernia operations. As the field continues to evolve, it is likely that safety will remain a paramount consideration, driving further innovations in both technology and surgical practice.
The economic landscape of robotic hernia surgery is complex, influenced by factors such as the cost of the robotic system, hospital fees, and insurance coverage. As this surgical technique becomes more prevalent, understanding its cost implications is crucial for patients and healthcare providers alike.
The cost of robotic hernia surgery is significantly influenced by the expense of the robotic system itself, which can be substantial. Hospital fees also play a crucial role in the overall cost, as they cover the use of the robotic equipment, operating room time, and post-operative care. According to recent studies, the average cost of robotic hernia surgery can range from $15,000 to $30,000 or more, depending on the complexity of the procedure and the hospital’s charges.
Key factors contributing to the cost include:
Insurance coverage for robotic hernia surgery varies across different providers and policies in the United States. While many insurance plans cover robotic surgery for hernia repair, the extent of coverage can differ significantly. Patients are advised to check with their insurance providers to understand what is covered and what out-of-pocket expenses they might incur.
“Insurance coverage for robotic hernia surgery is often subject to the specific terms of the patient’s insurance plan, including deductibles, co-pays, and pre-authorization requirements.”
When evaluating the cost-effectiveness of robotic hernia surgery, it’s essential to consider the long-term economic implications. Factors such as reduced recovery time, lower complication rates, and the potential for fewer recurrences can contribute to overall cost savings. A comprehensive long-term economic analysis should take into account:
| Factor | Traditional Surgery | Robotic Surgery |
| Recovery Time | Longer recovery periods | Shorter recovery periods |
| Complication Rates | Higher complication rates | Lower complication rates |
| Recurrence Rates | Potential for higher recurrence | Potential for lower recurrence |
By considering these factors, patients and healthcare providers can make more informed decisions about the use of robotic hernia surgery, balancing the initial costs against the potential long-term benefits.
Understanding the ideal candidates for robotic hernia repair is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Robotic hernia surgery offers several benefits, including enhanced precision and reduced recovery time, but its suitability depends on various medical considerations and patient characteristics.
The selection of patients for robotic hernia repair involves a thorough evaluation of their medical history, current health status, and the specific characteristics of their hernia. Factors such as the size and location of the hernia, the patient’s overall health, and any previous surgical history are crucial in determining the most appropriate surgical approach.
Patients with complex or recurrent hernias may particularly benefit from robotic hernia repair due to the enhanced dexterity and visualization offered by robotic systems. Additionally, patients who require precise dissection and mesh placement may be ideal candidates for this advanced technique.
While robotic hernia repair offers numerous advantages, there are scenarios where traditional or laparoscopic approaches may be more appropriate. For instance, patients with certain medical conditions that contraindicate the use of robotic technology or those who have had previous surgeries that complicate robotic access may benefit from alternative methods.
Laparoscopic hernia repair, for example, may be preferred in cases where the hernia is relatively simple and the patient’s anatomy is favorable. Traditional open repair might be necessary for patients with large or complex hernias that require a more extensive surgical approach.
In conclusion, identifying the ideal candidates for robotic hernia repair requires a comprehensive assessment of individual patient factors and medical considerations. By carefully selecting patients and tailoring the surgical approach to their specific needs, surgeons can optimize outcomes and improve patient satisfaction.
When it comes to hernia surgery, patients face a critical decision that impacts their health and quality of life. The type of hernia, overall health, and personal preferences are crucial factors in determining the most suitable surgical approach.
Making an informed decision about hernia surgery involves understanding the various surgical options, including traditional open surgery, laparoscopic repair, and robotic hernia surgery. Each method has its advantages and limitations, which should be carefully considered.
Patients should consult with healthcare professionals to discuss their individual circumstances and determine the best course of treatment. Considerations for choosing hernia surgery type include the complexity of the hernia, the patient’s overall health, and the potential risks and benefits associated with each surgical approach.
Informed decision-making for hernia repair is essential to ensure optimal outcomes and minimize potential complications. By understanding the available options and their implications, patients can make informed choices that align with their needs and preferences.
Robotic hernia surgery offers several advantages over traditional open surgery, including enhanced precision, smaller incisions, and potentially less pain and scarring. However, whether it is “better” depends on individual patient circumstances and the specific characteristics of the hernia.
Robotic hernia surgery provides improved 3D visualization, greater instrument dexterity, and enhanced precision, which can be particularly beneficial for complex hernia repairs. These advantages may result in better outcomes and a reduced risk of complications.
The recovery time for robotic hernia surgery is generally shorter compared to traditional open surgery, with most patients returning to normal activities within a few weeks. The exact recovery timeline can vary depending on the individual patient’s health and the complexity of the procedure.
As with any surgical procedure, robotic hernia surgery carries risks, including potential intraoperative complications, postoperative infection, and recurrence of the hernia. However, the overall risk profile is generally considered to be low, especially when performed by experienced surgeons.
Robotic hernia surgery can be more costly than traditional or laparoscopic hernia repair due to the advanced technology and equipment required. However, the overall cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery is influenced by various factors, including reduced hospital stay and potentially fewer complications.
The suitability of robotic hernia surgery depends on several factors, including the type and complexity of the hernia, overall health, and previous surgical history. A thorough evaluation by a qualified healthcare professional is necessary to determine the most appropriate surgical approach.
The Da Vinci Surgical System is a robotic platform that enables surgeons to perform complex procedures with enhanced precision and visualization. In robotic hernia surgery, the system allows for precise dissection and repair of the hernia, potentially leading to better outcomes.
Robotic hernia surgery and laparoscopic surgery are both minimally invasive approaches that can result in less postoperative pain compared to traditional open surgery. The specific pain management experience can vary depending on individual patient factors and the surgeon’s technique.
Robotic hernia surgery typically involves smaller incisions than traditional open surgery, which can result in less scarring and improved cosmetic outcomes. The long-term aesthetic results can be influenced by various factors, including skin elasticity and the size and location of the incisions.
Research suggests that robotic hernia surgery can result in comparable or potentially improved long-term outcomes compared to traditional or laparoscopic hernia repair. However, more studies are needed to fully understand the long-term benefits and potential risks of robotic hernia surgery.
