Psychiatry diagnoses and treats mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.
Send us all your questions or requests, and our expert team will assist you.
The diagnosis and evaluation of suicidality differ from standard medical diagnostics because “suicide” is not a disease but a behavior and a potential outcome. Consequently, there is no blood test or imaging scan that can definitively predict a suicide attempt. Instead, evaluation is a dynamic, clinical process aimed at estimating risk probability and identifying actionable targets for intervention. This process involves a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s psychiatric status, history, current stressors, and protective factors. The goal is not merely to predict the future—which is statistically difficult—but to formulate a safety strategy that mitigates risk.
Medical professionals employ a structured approach to evaluation, often combining clinical interviewing with standardized rating scales. This comprehensive evaluation usually occurs in emergency departments, psychiatric clinics, or primary care settings. The assessment seeks to answer three critical questions: Is the patient currently thinking about suicide? do they have the intent and means to act on those thoughts? and how imminent is the risk? The answers to these questions determine the level of care required, ranging from outpatient therapy to involuntary inpatient hospitalization.
The clinical interview is the “gold standard” of suicide risk assessment. It is a dialogue designed to build rapport while eliciting sensitive information. A skilled clinician creates a non-judgmental environment where the patient feels safe disclosing their darkest thoughts. The interview navigates through the history of the present illness, exploring the “narrative of the crisis”—what happened to bring the patient to this point.
Key components of the interview include assessing the frequency, intensity, and duration of suicidal thoughts. The clinician will ask specifically about planning: Has the patient rehearsed the act? Have they taken steps to avoid detection? The interview also explores the “capacity” for suicide, looking for a history of past attempts, exposure to violence, or familiarity with weapons. Past behavior is one of the strongest predictors of future behavior; therefore, a detailed history of previous attempts is essential.
While the clinical interview is subjective, standardized tools provide objective data and ensure that critical questions are not missed. These scales quantify the severity of depression and suicidality, providing a baseline for monitoring progress over time. They are widely used in triage to quickly identify patients who need immediate psychiatric attention.
However, these tools are adjuncts to, not replacements for, clinical judgment. A low score on a screening tool does not guarantee safety if the clinical impression suggests otherwise. The utility of these scales lies in their ability to standardize language across healthcare providers, ensuring that a “high risk” designation means the same thing to a nurse, a psychologist, and a psychiatrist.
Self-report measures allow patients to disclose symptoms they might be uncomfortable speaking about aloud. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a common depression screen that includes a specific question about self-harm. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) measures pessimism about the future, a key driver of suicidal intent. These tools are valuable for tracking symptom fluctuation day-to-day and can empower patients to monitor their own emotional temperature.
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is widely regarded as the industry standard for clinician-administered assessment. It distinguishes between suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior, probing the severity of intent. It guides the clinician through a flowchart of questions, helping to categorize the risk level with high precision. Other tools, like the SAD PERSONS scale, serve as mnemonics for residents and emergency staff to remember key risk factors, though they are less nuanced than the C-SSRS.
A comprehensive evaluation looks not only at why a person might die but also at why they might live. Protective factors are internal and external resources that buffer against suicide risk. Identifying these factors is crucial for safety planning. Internal protective factors include religious or moral objections to suicide, effective coping skills, and a sense of responsibility to others (e.g., children or pets).
External protective factors involve social support networks, positive relationships with therapeutic providers, and engagement in work or school. During the evaluation, clinicians actively search for “anchors”—reasons for living. Strengthening these anchors is a core component of the subsequent treatment plan. If a patient cannot identify any protective factors, the risk is considered significantly higher.
Suicidality rarely exists in a vacuum. The evaluation must diagnose any underlying psychiatric conditions driving the behavior. The differential diagnosis process involves distinguishing between conditions like Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder (where antidepressant monotherapy might worsen the risk), Schizophrenia (where command hallucinations might command suicide), and Personality Disorders.
Substance use assessment is paramount. Intoxication acts as a disinhibitor, increasing the likelihood of an impulsive attempt. Withdrawal states can also precipitate severe dysphoria and anxiety. The clinician must determine if the suicidality is primary or substance-induced. Treating the underlying condition—whether it is psychosis, mania, or addiction—is often the most effective way to reduce the suicide risk.
Medical evaluation includes ruling out organic causes of psychiatric distress. Certain medical conditions, such as thyroid dysfunction, neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy, brain tumors), and autoimmune diseases (e.g., lupus), can present with severe depression or psychosis. A physical exam and laboratory workup are standard procedure in an emergency evaluation.
This biological assessment also serves a protective function. If a patient has already initiated a suicide attempt (e.g., an overdose), medical stabilization takes precedence over psychiatric evaluation. Toxicology screens identify what substances have been ingested, guiding antidotal therapy.
Urine and blood toxicology screens are routine to detect the presence of alcohol, opioids, benzodiazepines, or stimulants. Knowing what is in the patient’s system helps explain their current mental state (e.g., is the agitation due to cocaine or mania?). It also informs medication safety, as mixing psychiatric medications with unknown street drugs can be fatal.
Blood tests evaluate thyroid function (TSH), vitamin levels (B12, D), and inflammatory markers. Neurological assessments check for signs of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or organic brain disease. TBI, in particular, is a known risk factor for impulse control issues and suicidality. Ensuring the brain is physically healthy is a prerequisite for effective psychiatric treatment.
The culmination of the diagnostic process is the risk formulation. This is not a simple “yes/no” but a stratified categorization: Low, Moderate, High, or Imminent.
Send us all your questions or requests, and our expert team will assist you.
The C-SSRS is a standardized tool used by clinicians to assess the severity and immediacy of suicide risk. It guides a series of questions to determine if a person has just thoughts, or if they have a plan, intent, and have engaged in preparatory behaviors.
No, there is currently no blood test that can diagnose suicide risk or predict a suicide attempt. However, blood tests are used to rule out medical conditions that affect mood (like thyroid issues) and to check for drugs or alcohol that might increase risk.
Protective factors are elements in a person’s life that reduce the likelihood of suicide. These include strong connections to family and friends, access to mental health care, effective coping skills, religious beliefs that discourage suicide, and the presence of dependent children or pets.
A history of past attempts is the single strongest statistical predictor of future suicide attempts. It indicates that the individual has previously overcome the survival instinct and the fear of pain, making it easier for them to cross that threshold again during a crisis.
If a person is deemed to be at imminent risk, they require immediate safety intervention. This typically involves not leaving the person alone, removing lethal means, and often necessitates hospitalization (voluntary or involuntary) to ensure their physical safety until the crisis stabilizes.
Leave your phone number and our medical team will call you back to discuss your healthcare needs and answer all your questions.
Your Comparison List (you must select at least 2 packages)
